Don't let these 3 assumptions derail your CRA compliance

Most engineering teams are making the same costly mistakes.

ready to close your CRA compliance gaps?

Assumptions

"We have time until 2027"
You don't; your development processes need to change now. If your product cycle takes 18 months, anything starting development today must already meet CRA requirements. The preparation window has closed.

"This is an IT security problem"
It's not; 60% of CRA requirements are about proving your processes, not implementing security features. Can you trace security requirement SEC-042 from initial specification through design, code, and testing, with timestamps, approvals, and decisions documented? This is a traceability challenge, not a security challenge.

"We're already ISO 21434/IEC 62304 compliant"
That covers 60-70% at best. What about the missing 30-40%? Critical traceability gaps that your current tool landscape can't bridge.
The CRA demands continuous, demonstrable connections between:

Components and products
Vulnerabilities and fixes
Requirements and tests
Third-party code and your validation

Most organizations can't provide this today.

What the CRA Really demands

Not just better security but proof that your security works. You must demonstrate:

Component tracking → Complete SBOM for every product
Vulnerability management → How you discover, assess, and fix issues
Requirements traceability → From security specs to verified tests
Lifecycle monitoring → Ongoing surveillance of third-party components

the two-hour test

If an auditor asks this question tomorrow: "Show me how you handled CVE-2024-1234 from discovery to fix." How long does your team need to answer?

Under 2 hours = you're prepared
2-8 hours = gaps exist
Days or "we'll get back to you" = serious compliance risk

Close your gaps before it's too late. The CRA isn't about having better security, it's about proving the security you already have, and that requires the right infrastructure.